Real Estate Eval Benchmark

Every real estate process is a test: the same input, the same prompt and an answer key that was frozen before any system ran. The table shows each process against each system, including the processes where Реалист is behind.

Scored on November 2, 2026: 15 processes for Реалист, 39 for other systems. 39 of 39 processes have a frozen answer key (1,575 criteria), frozen on October 30, 2026. On the 15 processes where Реалист has a valid run, Реалист passes 66.9% of criteria (strict) and Claude 71.9%; Claude on all 33 of its cases passes 69.9%. Median time: Реалист 3,779 s, Claude 116 s. Both judge models are from one vendor (Anthropic); a judge from a second vendor and an expert grade are not yet available, so scores are preliminary.

Process by system
ProcessClient typesРеалистClaude Opus 5.5 with web searchGPTGeminiWhere Реалист is behind
P01 Deal search: mandate to shortlistinvestor, broker, multi-asset81.0% of criteria (17 of 21), critical 6 of 781.0% of criteria (17 of 21), critical 6 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P02 Deal scoring: filters and weights against a mandateinvestor, multi-assetNo valid run: run did not finish, runner weekly limit50.0% of criteria (11 of 22), critical 3 of 6В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P03 OM screening: red flags and arithmeticinvestor, lender45.5% of criteria (10 of 22), critical 3 of 750.0% of criteria (11 of 22), critical 4 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 4.5 points: largest tenant
P04 Acquisition underwriting (real address, last trade, zoning, rates)investor78.6% of criteria (22 of 28), critical 4 of 460.7% of criteria (17 of 28), critical 3 of 4В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P05 Underwriting: T-12 vs tax record, NOI at priceinvestor, lenderNo valid run: run did not finish, runner weekly limit80.0% of criteria (24 of 30), critical 19 of 21В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P06 Rent roll audit vs leasesowner/AM, lenderNo valid run: run did not finish, runner session limit73.9% of criteria (17 of 23), critical 8 of 8В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P07 T-12 NOI reconciliationowner/AM, lenderNo valid run: run did not finish, runner session limit45.5% of criteria (10 of 22), critical 3 of 8В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P08 Debt sizing: three constraints, DSCR, debt yieldlender, developerNo valid run: run did not finish, runner login expired80.0% of criteria (16 of 20), critical 8 of 9В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P09 Refinance and defeasanceowner/AM, lender75.0% of criteria (15 of 20), critical 9 of 1270.0% of criteria (14 of 20), critical 9 of 12В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P10 Credit file: loan agreement abstractlender72.4% of criteria (21 of 29), critical 7 of 982.8% of criteria (24 of 29), critical 8 of 9В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 10.3 points: floating-rate floor
P11 Credit file: leasehold / ground lease for lenderlenderNo valid run: run did not finish, runner login expired67.7% of criteria (21 of 31), critical 5 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P12 Data-room audit: deal book reconciled across documentsinvestor, lenderNo valid run: run stopped by an engine configuration check52.9% of criteria (18 of 34), critical 5 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P13 Lease abstraction (office)owner/AM, brokerNo valid run: run did not finish, runner login expired90.9% of criteria (20 of 22), critical 6 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P14 Lease review for an occupier (sublease)corporateNo valid run: run stopped by an engine configuration check91.7% of criteria (22 of 24), critical 8 of 8В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P15 Lease comps for a tenant negotiationcorporate, brokerNo valid run: run stopped by an engine configuration check65.0% of criteria (13 of 20), critical 7 of 11В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P16 PSA reviewinvestor, broker10.0% of criteria (2 of 20), critical 1 of 1155.0% of criteria (11 of 20), critical 7 of 11В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 45.0 points: no analysis delivered, a clarifying question instead
P17 Title and environmental diligenceinvestor, lender80.0% of criteria (16 of 20), critical 7 of 975.0% of criteria (15 of 20), critical 6 of 9В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P18 Sales comps (real address, kept and rejected)investor, broker, lenderNo valid run: run did not finish, runner login expired59.3% of criteria (16 of 27), critical 5 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P19 Market rent and rent compsowner/AM, brokerNo valid run: run did not finish, runner login expired40.7% of criteria (11 of 27), critical 2 of 4В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P20 Valuation: value opinion and entry priceinvestor, lender75.0% of criteria (21 of 28), critical 5 of 667.9% of criteria (19 of 28), critical 5 of 6В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P21 BOV: broker opinion of valuebroker, owner/AM28.6% of criteria (8 of 28), critical 1 of 360.7% of criteria (17 of 28), critical 2 of 3В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 32.1 points: value opinion above the answer band, numbers
P22 Feasibility: as-of-right buildable, units, parkingdeveloper84.4% of criteria (27 of 32), critical 13 of 1584.4% of criteria (27 of 32), critical 14 of 15В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P23 Zoning and parking feasibilitydeveloper90.0% of criteria (18 of 20), critical 14 of 1585.0% of criteria (17 of 20), critical 14 of 15В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P24 Development construction loandeveloper, lender70.0% of criteria (14 of 20), critical 9 of 1265.0% of criteria (13 of 20), critical 9 of 12В ожиданииВ ожиданииNot behind
P25 Market study (supply, absorption, vacancy at delivery)developer, investor, corporate60.0% of criteria (12 of 20), critical 6 of 1170.0% of criteria (14 of 20), critical 9 of 11В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 10.0 points: market vintage mismatch, weakest submarket, conclusion
P26 Меморандум для инвесткомитетаinvestor, multi-assetNo valid run: run waited on a confirmation and the files it produced were not read60.0% of criteria (12 of 20), critical 4 of 8В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P27 IC deckinvestor, multi-asset65.0% of criteria (13 of 20), critical 7 of 1185.0% of criteria (17 of 20), critical 9 of 11В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 20.0 points: deck format items, files not read
P28 Property passport: site, zoning, historyinvestor, broker, owner/AM, lenderNo valid run: run not started93.3% of criteria (28 of 30), critical 7 of 7В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P29 Property tax reassessment on saleowner/AM, investor78.6% of criteria (22 of 28), critical 17 of 2082.1% of criteria (23 of 28), critical 17 of 20В ожиданииВ ожиданииBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 3.6 points: exclusions untested
P30 Rent-cap compliance and mark-to-marketowner/AMNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit62.1% of criteria (18 of 29), critical 13 of 23В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P31 Hotel management agreement (owner side)owner/AM, lenderNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit63.3% of criteria (19 of 30), critical 8 of 9В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P32 Multi-asset model operation: move exit cap on 20 assetsmulti-assetNo valid run: run not started; Claude graded on the written answer only92.9% of criteria (13 of 14), critical 3 of 3В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P33 Multi-asset model operation: fix a broken formulamulti-assetNo valid run: run not started; Claude graded on the written answer only76.5% of criteria (13 of 17), critical 2 of 3В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P34 Property data accuracy: 10 recorded figures per address (DATABENCH)allВ ожидании76.7% of figures (468 of 610)В ожиданииВ ожиданииВ ожидании
P35 Owner and people search (owner of record, controlling person, contact path)broker, investorNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit47.4% of criteria (18 of 38)В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P36 Signals: distress and market events on a watched setinvestor, lenderNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit59.5% of criteria (22 of 37)В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P37 Portfolio monitoring: what changed since last reviewowner/AM, multi-asset, lenderNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit88.0% of criteria (22 of 25)В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P38 OM and BOV deck authoring from source documentsbrokerNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit80.8% of criteria (21 of 26)В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run
P39 Deal search from listings against a buy box (live inventory)investor, brokerNo valid run: run not started, daily internal-run limit84.6% of criteria (22 of 26)В ожиданииВ ожиданииNo valid Реалист run

All 39 processes have a frozen case and answer key. GPT and Gemini columns stay pending until those models are run under the same rules.

Where Реалист is behind

A process lands here when Реалист scores below the best other system on the share of criteria passed. The failed criteria class is shown with it. Nothing is removed from this list to make the table look better.

P16 PSA reviewBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 45.0 points: no analysis delivered, a clarifying question instead
P21 BOV: broker opinion of valueBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 32.1 points: value opinion above the answer band, numbers
P27 IC deckBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 20.0 points: deck format items, files not read
P10 Credit file: loan agreement abstractBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 10.3 points: floating-rate floor
P25 Market study (supply, absorption, vacancy at delivery)Behind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 10.0 points: market vintage mismatch, weakest submarket, conclusion
P03 OM screening: red flags and arithmeticBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 4.5 points: largest tenant
P29 Property tax reassessment on saleBehind Claude Opus 5.5 with web search by 3.6 points: exclusions untested

Time: Реалист is slower on every matched case, median 3,779 s against 116 s for Claude.

Where Реалист is ahead or level
P04 Acquisition underwriting (real address, last trade, zoning, rates)Ahead by 17.9 points
P20 Valuation: value opinion and entry priceAhead by 7.1 points
P09 Refinance and defeasanceAhead by 5.0 points
P17 Title and environmental diligenceAhead by 5.0 points
P23 Zoning and parking feasibilityAhead by 5.0 points
P24 Development construction loanAhead by 5.0 points
P01 Deal search: mandate to shortlistУровень
P22 Feasibility: as-of-right buildable, units, parkingУровень
Метод
  1. One case per process and client type. The list has 39 processes for 7 client types: investor, lender, developer, owner and asset manager, broker, corporate occupier and multi-asset holder.
  2. The case file holds the prompt, the documents, the answer key and the tolerance for every number. It is frozen with a hash of each file before the first run. A run counts only if the file it used has the frozen hash. A key is never edited after the first run: a correction is a new version and the old results stay.
  3. Every system gets the same input and the same prompt, once, with no hints and no retries. Реалист runs on its own engine. The general models run with web search in an empty working directory, with no memory and no added skills.
  4. Numbers are checked against the key with the case tolerance (exact, absolute or percent). This step is deterministic and uses no model.
  5. Every other criterion is graded by two judge models. The judges are not told which system wrote the answer, and a criterion counts as passed only when both pass it. Both judge models are from one vendor (Anthropic); a judge from a second vendor and an expert grade are not yet available, so scores are preliminary. Where a human expert has graded the same sheet, the expert’s grade will win over the judges.
  6. Each case reports the share of criteria passed, whether every critical criterion passed, number accuracy and run time. The table is process by system.
  7. The team that wrote a key does not score it.

Answer keys frozen October 30, 2026.

Prompts

The prompt is published next to the result. Where the documents of a case may not be shown, the page shows the score and the class of the criteria that failed, not the documents. Typography is normalized for display (long dashes shown as commas); the hash covers the original file.

P06 Rent roll audit vs leasesTake the rent roll and the lease folder for this Austin property and tell me: occupancy, in-place average rent per unit and per SF, loss-to-lease against the rents the leases actually carry, how many units expire in the next 6 and 12 months, and every unit where the roll and the leases disagree. Flag anything that would change what I underwrite.
P12 Data-room audit: deal book reconciled across documentsHere's the full book on Bayou Crest Apartments in Houston, OM, rent roll, T-12, sample leases, the management agreement. Before this goes to IC I need the documents reconciled against each other: everywhere the OM's story doesn't match the roll, the T-12, the leases, what each gap is worth, and the questions I should send the broker. Then screen it against our buy box and tell me honestly how many criteria it passes.
P22 Feasibility: as-of-right buildable, units, parkingRun the feasibility on 1412 Quillfeather Place. Tell me the as-of-right residential buildable area, which control binds it and why, the unit count at a 750 SF average, whether any parking is required, what the inclusionary option is worth and what it costs, and whether the broker's 19,300 SF and the community facility number are right. Show the arithmetic.
P32 Multi-asset model operation: move exit cap on 20 assetsMove the exit cap rate out 50 bps on the first 20 assets.
P33 Multi-asset model operation: fix a broken formulaSomeone pasted a value over the NOI formula in one month of the second asset. Put the formula back.

The prompts of the other cases are published with their first scored result.